linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] fsfreeze: moving from uniterruptible to killable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANGUGtD9BNQO9pvO+yeKHc0qojk61fKYDgKm8kfWzu8pCk=YJw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 27 Mar 2013 12:39:10 +0100
From:	Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@...il.com>
To:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc:	Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] fsfreeze: moving from uniterruptible to killable

2013/3/26 Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>:
> On Sun 24-03-13 10:10:59, Marco Stornelli wrote:
>> When a fs is frozen, a process can hang because we wait in
>> uniterruptible state. We give the user the possibility to kill the process.
>   Yes, but it needs slightly more work as you probably know... (bailing out
> properly when the signal arrives).
>
>                                                                 Honza
>

Of course, indeed, it was only an RFC to start a discussion, not a
patch :) The point was: is this kind of change a behaviour that can
break user-space in some way? IMHO no, but I'd like to have a
discussion about that before to start coding. What do you think?

Marco
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/