linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] Input: mma8450 - fix signed 12bits to 32bits conversion

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CADFrO6HRWfjTxkmLfVdq3+GBEQShNx5QUDEnMwZcTBx7e+SOxg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 28 Mar 2013 08:36:52 +0100
From:	Sebastien Royen <sebastien.royen@...il.com>
To:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc:	Bill Pemberton <wfp5p@...ginia.edu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	seb <sebastien.royen@...adeus.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Input: mma8450 - fix signed 12bits to 32bits conversion

Hi Dmitry

2013/3/28 Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
>
> Hi Seb,
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 09:17:43AM +0100, seb wrote:
> > Event value is wrong. Should be in range -2048 to 2047, but is in range 0 to 4095.
> > Use int8_t to int conversion and remove 0xfff mask.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: seb <sebastien.royen@...adeus.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/input/misc/mma8450.c |   15 ++++++++++-----
> >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/mma8450.c b/drivers/input/misc/mma8450.c
> > index 480557f..c3781a1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/input/misc/mma8450.c
> > +++ b/drivers/input/misc/mma8450.c
> > @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ static void mma8450_poll(struct input_polled_dev *dev)
> >       struct mma8450 *m = dev->private;
> >       int x, y, z;
> >       int ret;
> > -     u8 buf[6];
> > +     int8_t buf[6];
> >
> >       ret = mma8450_read(m, MMA8450_STATUS);
> >       if (ret < 0)
> > @@ -119,13 +119,18 @@ static void mma8450_poll(struct input_polled_dev *dev)
> >       if (!(ret & MMA8450_STATUS_ZXYDR))
> >               return;
> >
> > -     ret = mma8450_read_block(m, MMA8450_OUT_X_LSB, buf, sizeof(buf));
> > +     ret = mma8450_read_block(m, MMA8450_OUT_X_LSB, (u8*)buf, sizeof(buf));
> >       if (ret < 0)
> >               return;
> >
> > -     x = ((buf[1] << 4) & 0xff0) | (buf[0] & 0xf);
> > -     y = ((buf[3] << 4) & 0xff0) | (buf[2] & 0xf);
> > -     z = ((buf[5] << 4) & 0xff0) | (buf[4] & 0xf);
> > +     /* convert 8 MSB from int8_t to int */
> > +     x = buf[1];
> > +     y = buf[3];
> > +     z = buf[5];
> > +     /* add 4 LSB */
> > +     x = (x << 4) | (buf[0] & 0xf);
> > +     y = (y << 4) | (buf[2] & 0xf);
> > +     z = (z << 4) | (buf[4] & 0xf);
>
> Should we just say:
>
>         x = ((int)(s8)buf[1] << 4) | (buf[0] & 0xf);
>         y = ...
>         z = ...
>
> and leave the rest as is?
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> Dmitry

Yes, it works too and is more close to original version.
It's my first contrib so I'm not familiar with process,
do you need another patch with right changes ?

Regards,

Sebastien Royen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/