[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130328081415.GA18754@core.coreip.homeip.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 01:14:15 -0700
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Sebastien Royen <sebastien.royen@...il.com>
Cc: Bill Pemberton <wfp5p@...ginia.edu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
seb <sebastien.royen@...adeus.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Input: mma8450 - fix signed 12bits to 32bits
conversion
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 08:36:52AM +0100, Sebastien Royen wrote:
> Hi Dmitry
>
> 2013/3/28 Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
> >
> > Hi Seb,
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 09:17:43AM +0100, seb wrote:
> > > Event value is wrong. Should be in range -2048 to 2047, but is in range 0 to 4095.
> > > Use int8_t to int conversion and remove 0xfff mask.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: seb <sebastien.royen@...adeus.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/input/misc/mma8450.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
> > > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/mma8450.c b/drivers/input/misc/mma8450.c
> > > index 480557f..c3781a1 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/input/misc/mma8450.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/input/misc/mma8450.c
> > > @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ static void mma8450_poll(struct input_polled_dev *dev)
> > > struct mma8450 *m = dev->private;
> > > int x, y, z;
> > > int ret;
> > > - u8 buf[6];
> > > + int8_t buf[6];
> > >
> > > ret = mma8450_read(m, MMA8450_STATUS);
> > > if (ret < 0)
> > > @@ -119,13 +119,18 @@ static void mma8450_poll(struct input_polled_dev *dev)
> > > if (!(ret & MMA8450_STATUS_ZXYDR))
> > > return;
> > >
> > > - ret = mma8450_read_block(m, MMA8450_OUT_X_LSB, buf, sizeof(buf));
> > > + ret = mma8450_read_block(m, MMA8450_OUT_X_LSB, (u8*)buf, sizeof(buf));
> > > if (ret < 0)
> > > return;
> > >
> > > - x = ((buf[1] << 4) & 0xff0) | (buf[0] & 0xf);
> > > - y = ((buf[3] << 4) & 0xff0) | (buf[2] & 0xf);
> > > - z = ((buf[5] << 4) & 0xff0) | (buf[4] & 0xf);
> > > + /* convert 8 MSB from int8_t to int */
> > > + x = buf[1];
> > > + y = buf[3];
> > > + z = buf[5];
> > > + /* add 4 LSB */
> > > + x = (x << 4) | (buf[0] & 0xf);
> > > + y = (y << 4) | (buf[2] & 0xf);
> > > + z = (z << 4) | (buf[4] & 0xf);
> >
> > Should we just say:
> >
> > x = ((int)(s8)buf[1] << 4) | (buf[0] & 0xf);
> > y = ...
> > z = ...
> >
> > and leave the rest as is?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > --
> > Dmitry
>
> Yes, it works too and is more close to original version.
> It's my first contrib so I'm not familiar with process,
> do you need another patch with right changes ?
Yes please as I do not have the hardware to test modified patch.
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists