[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51548E89.9060505@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 13:40:09 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
CC: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: irq: Call irqchit_init if no init_irq function
is specified
On 03/28/2013 09:51 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 09:48:18AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On 03/28/2013 04:41 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>>> + if (machine_desc->init_irq)
>>> + machine_desc->init_irq();
>>> + else
>>> + irqchip_init();
>>
>> There needs to be an empty version defined for !OF.
>
> Better:
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_OF
> if (!machine_desc->init_irq)
> irqchip_init();
> else
> #endif
Or the new style:
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && !machine_desc->init_irq)
irqchip_init();
else
That needs the empty version, but handles your case.
Rob
> machine_desc->init_irq();
>
> which means we don't even get the test if !OF, and if someone mistakenly
> sets this to NULL for a !OF platform, they get to know about it.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists