[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130328190207.GF3368@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 19:02:08 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: irq: Call irqchit_init if no init_irq
function is specified
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 01:40:09PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 03/28/2013 09:51 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 09:48:18AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> >> On 03/28/2013 04:41 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> >>> + if (machine_desc->init_irq)
> >>> + machine_desc->init_irq();
> >>> + else
> >>> + irqchip_init();
> >>
> >> There needs to be an empty version defined for !OF.
> >
> > Better:
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_OF
> > if (!machine_desc->init_irq)
> > irqchip_init();
> > else
> > #endif
>
> Or the new style:
>
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && !machine_desc->init_irq)
> irqchip_init();
> else
>
> That needs the empty version, but handles your case.
It shouldn't need the empty version at all - because the compiler should
optimize the "true" case away entirely.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists