[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <11307583.LtSeEfeXbs@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2013 02:12:29 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI, ACPI: Don't query OSC support with all possible controls
On Friday, March 29, 2013 06:02:45 PM Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> >> - /* Run _OSC query for all possible controls. */
> >> - capbuf[OSC_CONTROL_TYPE] = OSC_PCI_CONTROL_MASKS;
> >> + /* Run _OSC query only with existing controls. */
> >> + capbuf[OSC_CONTROL_TYPE] = root->osc_control_set;
> >
> > I suppose we can do that, but then why this should be root->osc_control_set and
> > not just 0?
>
> in case query support and set control are called in mixed sequence.
OK, that's a good enough reason I think.
I'm kind of afarid of regressions that may result from this, though, so I'm
going to queue it up for 3.10.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists