[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQV+zic-pi4yomQDoy-Rc0u1_+s4KbXJZKf9i_9xkvaknA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 18:08:35 -0700
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI, ACPI: Don't query OSC support with all possible controls
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> On Friday, March 29, 2013 06:02:45 PM Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
>> >> - /* Run _OSC query for all possible controls. */
>> >> - capbuf[OSC_CONTROL_TYPE] = OSC_PCI_CONTROL_MASKS;
>> >> + /* Run _OSC query only with existing controls. */
>> >> + capbuf[OSC_CONTROL_TYPE] = root->osc_control_set;
>> >
>> > I suppose we can do that, but then why this should be root->osc_control_set and
>> > not just 0?
>>
>> in case query support and set control are called in mixed sequence.
>
> OK, that's a good enough reason I think.
>
> I'm kind of afarid of regressions that may result from this, though, so I'm
> going to queue it up for 3.10.
Ok,
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists