linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V4 0/2] Implement per policy instance of governor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKohpo=AKcuJBxv+6aDOoZ9QYjPj4SqckFPaf-P06hvsCDZ=ig@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 31 Mar 2013 09:17:52 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
	patches@...aro.org, arvind.chauhan@....com, robin.randhawa@....com,
	Steve.Bannister@....com, Liviu.Dudau@....com,
	charles.garcia-tobin@....com, jacob.shin@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 0/2] Implement per policy instance of governor

On 31 March 2013 07:19, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> Yes, thanks.
>
> But the patches moving cpufreq drivers into drivers/cpufreq from somewhere else
> need each an ACK from the maintainer of that other place.  I won't take any
> patches like that without AKCs.

Okay. I will ask respective maintainers (Who haven't acked until now)
to provide one.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/