[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4183493.GBcPoVddxx@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2013 03:49:13 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
patches@...aro.org, arvind.chauhan@....com, robin.randhawa@....com,
Steve.Bannister@....com, Liviu.Dudau@....com,
charles.garcia-tobin@....com, jacob.shin@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 0/2] Implement per policy instance of governor
On Sunday, March 31, 2013 07:00:16 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 31 March 2013 03:38, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> > OK, I'll remove it.
>
> Thanks.
>
> > And by the way, I'm no longer amused with the mess going on in the cpufreq land.
> >
> > Please send me *patches*. I'm not interested in git pointers.
>
> Hmm.
>
> > Moreover, please send those patches in a way allowing me to figure out the
> > ordering without looking into your git tree.
>
> Yes, i was planning to do so.
>
> > If you have a number of outstanding cpufreq patches for me to apply, please
> > create a patch series out of them and send it.
>
> Do you mean, i should merge all stuff i have queued up for 3.10 in a
> single patchset?
> Like for-3.10? Will do.
Yes, thanks.
But the patches moving cpufreq drivers into drivers/cpufreq from somewhere else
need each an ACK from the maintainer of that other place. I won't take any
patches like that without AKCs.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists