linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V4 0/2] Implement per policy instance of governor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKohponaAyo2BL3X+rxNTO9-u88dfj7Vho6zRyUmvct6XyHyVw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 31 Mar 2013 07:00:16 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
	patches@...aro.org, arvind.chauhan@....com, robin.randhawa@....com,
	Steve.Bannister@....com, Liviu.Dudau@....com,
	charles.garcia-tobin@....com, jacob.shin@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 0/2] Implement per policy instance of governor

On 31 March 2013 03:38, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> OK, I'll remove it.

Thanks.

> And by the way, I'm no longer amused with the mess going on in the cpufreq land.
>
> Please send me *patches*.  I'm not interested in git pointers.

Hmm.

> Moreover, please send those patches in a way allowing me to figure out the
> ordering without looking into your git tree.

Yes, i was planning to do so.

> If you have a number of outstanding cpufreq patches for me to apply, please
> create a patch series out of them and send it.

Do you mean, i should merge all stuff i have queued up for 3.10 in a
single patchset?
Like for-3.10? Will do.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/