[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <515791A8.7010904@surriel.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2013 21:30:16 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
To: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
CC: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, davidlohr.bueso@...com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
hhuang@...hat.com, jason.low2@...com, walken@...gle.com,
lwoodman@...hat.com, chegu_vinod@...com,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm -next] ipc,sem: untangle RCU locking with find_alloc_undo
On 03/30/2013 09:35 AM, Sasha Levin wrote:
> I'm thinking that the solution is as simple as:
Your patch is absolutely correct. All it needs now is your
signed-off-by, so Andrew can merge it into -mm :)
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
> diff --git a/ipc/sem.c b/ipc/sem.c
> index 6e109ef..ac36671 100644
> --- a/ipc/sem.c
> +++ b/ipc/sem.c
> @@ -1333,8 +1333,10 @@ static int semctl_main(struct ipc_namespace *ns, int semid, int semnum,
> /* GETVAL, GETPID, GETNCTN, GETZCNT: fall-through */
> }
> err = -EINVAL;
> - if(semnum < 0 || semnum >= nsems)
> - goto out_unlock;
> + if(semnum < 0 || semnum >= nsems) {
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + goto out_wakeup;
> + }
>
> sem_lock(sma, NULL, -1);
> curr = &sma->sem_base[semnum];
>
> But I'm not 100% sure if I don't mess up anything else.
I checked the surrounding code, it all looks fine.
--
All rights reversed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists