[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130401144225.GC21859@tuxdriver.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 10:42:25 -0400
From: "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
To: Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@...onical.com>
Cc: phaber@...adcom.com, arend@...adcom.com, pieterpg@...adcom.com,
meuleman@...adcom.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
brudley@...adcom.com, frankyl@...adcom.com,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, brcm80211-dev-list@...adcom.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v3.8, v3.9] [Regression] brcmsmac: move PHY functions
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 03:52:39PM -0400, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
> Hi Piotr,
>
> A bug was opened against the Ubuntu kernel[0]. After a kernel
> bisect, it was found that reverting the following commit resolved
> this bug:
>
> commit b83576341664957978e125f5f5db2f15496980b1
> Author: Piotr Haber <phaber@...adcom.com>
> Date: Wed Nov 28 21:44:09 2012 +0100
>
> brcmsmac: move PHY functions
>
> The regression was introduced as of v3.8-rc1. The regression still
> exists in v3.9-rc4.
>
> I see that you are the author of this patch, so I wanted to run this
> by you. I was thinking of requesting a revert for v3.9, but I
> wanted to get your feedback first.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Joe
>
> [0] http://pad.lv/1131914
I recently reverted b6fc28a1, which is the follow-on to that patch.
The revert is _not_ in 3.9-rc5.
Could you try reverting that patch instead? Does that fix the issue
for you?
John
--
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@...driver.com might be all we have. Be ready.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists