[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5159A559.4000808@canonical.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 11:18:49 -0400
From: Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@...onical.com>
To: "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
CC: phaber@...adcom.com, arend@...adcom.com, pieterpg@...adcom.com,
meuleman@...adcom.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
brudley@...adcom.com, frankyl@...adcom.com,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, brcm80211-dev-list@...adcom.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v3.8, v3.9] [Regression] brcmsmac: move PHY functions
On 04/01/2013 10:42 AM, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 03:52:39PM -0400, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
>> Hi Piotr,
>>
>> A bug was opened against the Ubuntu kernel[0]. After a kernel
>> bisect, it was found that reverting the following commit resolved
>> this bug:
>>
>> commit b83576341664957978e125f5f5db2f15496980b1
>> Author: Piotr Haber <phaber@...adcom.com>
>> Date: Wed Nov 28 21:44:09 2012 +0100
>>
>> brcmsmac: move PHY functions
>>
>> The regression was introduced as of v3.8-rc1. The regression still
>> exists in v3.9-rc4.
>>
>> I see that you are the author of this patch, so I wanted to run this
>> by you. I was thinking of requesting a revert for v3.9, but I
>> wanted to get your feedback first.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Joe
>>
>> [0] http://pad.lv/1131914
> I recently reverted b6fc28a1, which is the follow-on to that patch.
> The revert is _not_ in 3.9-rc5.
>
> Could you try reverting that patch instead? Does that fix the issue
> for you?
>
> John
Hi John,
Thanks for the response.
Yes, reverting commit b6fc28a1 does resolve this bug. That is the
appropriate fix for this issue. Thanks for the assistance.
Thanks,
Joe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists