[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130401064418.GE1693@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 14:44:20 +0800
From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
CC: <rjw@...k.pl>, <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>, <patches@...aro.org>,
<robin.randhawa@....com>, <Steve.Bannister@....com>,
<Liviu.Dudau@....com>, <charles.garcia-tobin@....com>,
<arvind.chauhan@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: No need to check cpu number in
init()
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 06:26:29PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> It is not possible for init() to be called for any cpu other than cpu0. During
> bootup whatever cpu is used to boot system will be assigned as cpu0. And later
> on policy->cpu can only change if we hotunplug all cpus first and then hotplug
> them back in different order, which isn't possible (system requires atleast one
> cpu to be up always :)).
>
> Though I can see one situation where policy->cpu can be different then zero.
> - Hot-unplug cpu 0.
> - rmmod cpufreq-cpu0 module
> - insmod it back
> - hotplug cpu 0 again.
>
> Here, policy->cpu would be different. But the driver doesn't have any dependency
> on cpu0 as such. We don't mind which cpu of a system is policy->cpu and so this
> check is just not required.
>
> Remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists