[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130403114935.GA11305@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 12:49:37 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Girish KS <girishks2000@...il.com>
Cc: spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
grant.likely@...retlab.ca, t.figa@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/5] spi: s3c64xx: added support for polling mode
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 05:00:04PM +0530, Girish KS wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Mark Brown
> >> - if (!sdd->pdev->dev.of_node) {
> >> + if (!sdd->pdev->dev.of_node && !is_polling(sdd)) {
> >> res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_DMA, 0);
> >> if (!res) {
> >> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Unable to get SPI tx dma "
> > It seems like it'd be sensible to also handle failure to get the DMA
> > resource by going into polling mode.
> There are 2 cases currently i have identified and handled,
> 1. The SoC's dont have DMA support for spi controller. For such SoC's we
> would not add the dma resource in the spi dts node. In this case the probe
> would return error if failure for DMA resuorce is handled.
That's not what the code currently does...
> 2. The SoC has a DMA support for SPI controller, but due to some x
> reason(H/W bug),
> the driver would force polling mode by enabling
> S3C64XX_SPI_QUIRK_POLL in driver
> data. For such SoC's there would be a dma entry in the spi controller
> dts node, and
> probe can handle failure for DMA resource successfully.
> To handle above both situations successfully if
> (!sdd->pdev->dev.of_node && !is_polling(sdd)) is used.
Right, that's what the code currently does but what I'm suggesting is
that this isn't the most helpful thing to do and that printing a big
warning then soldiering on in polling mode might be more useful.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists