[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK=Wgbb7ZDhG5yeBVWZJ2TYpo-ckTYsrtQ6MR=Ge0tKz5bts6A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 17:46:49 +0300
From: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>
To: Li Fei <fei.li@...el.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5 V2] hwspinlock/core: call pm_runtime_put in
pm_runtime_get_sync failed case
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Li Fei <fei.li@...el.com> wrote:
> Even in failed case of pm_runtime_get_sync, the usage_count
> is incremented. In order to keep the usage_count with correct
> value and runtime power management to behave correctly, call
> pm_runtime_put(_sync) in such case.
>
> In __hwspin_lock_request, module_put is also called before
> return in pm_runtime_get_sync failed case.
>
> Signed-off-by Liu Chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Li Fei <fei.li@...el.com>
Applied (after fixing the commit log to reflect the recent change), thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists