[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130407095025.GA31307@pd.tnic>
Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2013 11:50:26 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, dhillf@...il.com,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: kernel BUG at kernel/smpboot.c:134!
On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 11:20:10AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> And it's even more bogus because the cpu to which we would bind in
> kthread_create_on_cpu() is not yet online.
In case you guys are wondering about reproducibility, I saw the same
BUG_ON yesterday on a 32-bit atom smp qemu guest too (don't ask why?
:-))
And yes, this was without kvm (software emulation only in qemu).
[ 0.395000] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 0.395000] kernel BUG at kernel/smpboot.c:134!
[ 0.395000] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[ 0.395000] Modules linked in:
[ 0.395000] Pid: 13, comm: ksoftirqd/1 Not tainted 3.9.0-rc5+ #31 Bochs Bochs
[ 0.395000] EIP: 0060:[<c106542c>] EFLAGS: 00000202 CPU: 0
[ 0.395000] EIP is at smpboot_thread_fn+0x20c/0x260
[ 0.395000] EAX: 00000000 EBX: f60ba430 ECX: 00000000 EDX: 00000001
[ 0.395000] ESI: f60024f0 EDI: c1736480 EBP: f60c1f24 ESP: f60c1f04
[ 0.395000] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0000 SS: 0068
[ 0.395000] CR0: 8005003b CR2: ffe17000 CR3: 01943000 CR4: 000006e0
[ 0.395000] DR0: 00000000 DR1: 00000000 DR2: 00000000 DR3: 00000000
[ 0.395000] DR6: 00000000 DR7: 00000000
[ 0.395000] Process ksoftirqd/1 (pid: 13, ti=f60c0000 task=f60ba430 task.ti=f60c0000)
[ 0.395000] Stack:
[ 0.395000] f60ba430 00000001 00000000 f60c1f24 c105c49d f6083e7c f60024f0 c1065220
[ 0.395000] f60c1fac c105c745 00000001 00000001 f60024f0 00000000 c1510303 dead4ead
[ 0.395000] ffffffff ffffffff c1b510ac c1c28450 00000000 c167e791 00000000 c151744f
[ 0.395000] Call Trace:
[ 0.395000] [<c105c49d>] ? __kthread_parkme+0x2d/0x70
[ 0.395000] [<c1065220>] ? lg_lock_init+0x20/0x20
[ 0.395000] [<c105c745>] kthread+0x95/0xa0
[ 0.395000] [<c1510303>] ? dump_pagetable+0xa/0x101
[ 0.395000] [<c151744f>] ? wait_for_common+0xcf/0x110
[ 0.395000] [<c1060000>] ? __remove_hrtimer+0x90/0xa0
[ 0.395000] [<c151a477>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x1b/0x28
[ 0.395000] [<c105c6b0>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x60/0x60
[ 0.395000] Code: 0f a3 02 19 d2 85 d2 0f 95 c2 0f b6 d2 ff d1 89 f0 e8 69 25 0b 00 8d 64 24 14 31 c0 5b 5e 5f 5d c3 e8 d9 2b 4b 00 e9 68
fe ff ff <0f> 0b 66 90 e8 cb 2b 4b 00 e9 ac fe ff ff 8d b6 00 00 00 00 e8
[ 0.395000] EIP: [<c106542c>] smpboot_thread_fn+0x20c/0x260 SS:ESP 0068:f60c1f04
[ 0.403466] ---[ end trace f5696bc4e08aa88f ]---
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists