linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 8 Apr 2013 11:22:43 +0200
From:	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@...l.ru>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree

Hi Alexander,

On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 08:45:51AM +0400, Alexander Shiyan wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> > After merging the mfd tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> > failed like this:
> > 
> > drivers/regulator/anatop-regulator.c: In function 'anatop_regulator_probe':
> > drivers/regulator/anatop-regulator.c:134:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'of_get_parent' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > 
> > Caused by commit 5ab3a89a741f ("mfd: syscon: Add non-DT support").
> > 
> > I have used the mfd tree from next-20130405 for today.
> 
> This means that we do not have empty declarations for the
> of_xx functions in linux/of.h for !CONFIG_OF.
> OK to declare these functions or any other opinions?
Ok with me, but you'd need to get Grant and Rob's ACK.

Cheers,
Samuel.

-- 
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/