linux-kernel - Re[2]: [PATCH] regulator: mc13783: Add device tree probe support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 08 Apr 2013 20:46:39 +0400
From:	Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@...l.ru>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc:	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>
Subject: Re[2]: [PATCH] regulator: mc13783: Add device tree probe support

Hello.

> On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 09:02:11PM +0400, Alexander Shiyan wrote:
> > Patch adds device tree probe support for mc13783-regulator driver.
> 
> I'd expect to see a document describing the binding for any new binding.
OK.
 
> > +	if (num_parsed != num_regulators) {
> > +		dev_warn(&pdev->dev,
> > +		"parsed %d != regulators %d - check your device tree!\n",
> > +			num_parsed, num_regulators);
> >  
> > -		init_data = &pdata->regulators[i];
> > -		desc = &mc13783_regulators[init_data->id].desc;
> > +		num_regulators = num_parsed;
> > +		priv->num_regulators = num_regulators;
> 
> Why is this something we warn about?  Users should be able to omit
> unused regulators, no point in adding nodes that don't have any real
> information.

Warning is appear on nonexistent regulators names only.
I will rewrite warning procedure in the v2 globally for mc13xx.
Thanks.

---