lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 8 Apr 2013 17:54:26 +0000
From:	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To:	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
CC:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Bill Pemberton <wfp5p@...ginia.edu>,
	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@....ac.uk>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
	Sonic Zhang <sonic.zhang@...log.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] staging/adt7316 Fix some 'interesting' string operations

> I think it is a good idea to switch directly to strtobool. But anyway, if you
> don't want to respin the patch it is fine as it is.

I didn't know that strtobool() existed ... but now that I do I agree that it would
be better to use it here.  But ... I'm less comfortable updating the patch to use
it. User visible behavior would change (currently just "1" is considered "true",
but strtobool would also accept "y" and "Y").  I'd also have to think hard about
what to do if strtobool() said the input was not a valid boolean.

Thanks for the review.

-Tony

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ