linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86, amd, mce: Prevent potential cpu-online oops

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 09 Apr 2013 13:34:01 +0200
From:	Steffen Persvold <sp@...ascale.com>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Daniel J Blueman <daniel@...ascale-asia.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, amd, mce: Prevent potential cpu-online oops

On 4/9/2013 12:24 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 11:45:44AM +0200, Steffen Persvold wrote:
>> Hmm, yes of course. This of course breaks on our slave servers when
>> the shared mechanism doesn't work properly (i.e NB not visible). Then
>> all cores gets individual kobjects and there can be discrepancies
>> between what the hardware is programmed to and what is reflected in
>> /sys on some cores..
>
> Hold on, are you saying you have cores with an invisible NB? How does
> that even work? Or is it only invisible to sw?

only invisible to the kernel because the multi-pci-domains isn't working 
pre 3.9 on our architecture.

cheers,
Steffen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/