[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130410052619.GD5872@lge.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 14:26:19 +0900
From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm, slub: count freed pages via rcu as this task's
reclaimed_slab
Hello, Christoph.
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 02:28:06PM +0000, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Apr 2013, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>
> > Currently, freed pages via rcu is not counted for reclaimed_slab, because
> > it is freed in rcu context, not current task context. But, this free is
> > initiated by this task, so counting this into this task's reclaimed_slab
> > is meaningful to decide whether we continue reclaim, or not.
> > So change code to count these pages for this task's reclaimed_slab.
>
> slab->reclaim_state guides the reclaim actions in vmscan.c. With this
> patch slab->reclaim_state could get quite a high value without new pages being
> available for allocation. slab->reclaim_state will only be updated
> when the RCU period ends.
Okay.
In addition, there is a little place who use SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU.
I will drop this patch[2/3] and [3/3] for next spin.
Thanks.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@...ck.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@...ck.org"> email@...ck.org </a>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists