lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 10 Apr 2013 10:33:46 +0100
From:	Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: Warn on comparisons to true and false

On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 08:17:14PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> Comparisons of A to true and false are better written
> as A and !A.
> 
> Bleat a message on use.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
> ---
>  scripts/checkpatch.pl | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> index 3fb6d86..080e7f6 100755
> --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> @@ -3538,6 +3538,23 @@ sub process {
>  			     "Using yield() is generally wrong. See yield() kernel-doc (sched/core.c)\n"  . $herecurr);
>  		}
>  
> +# check for comparisons against true and false
> +		if ($line =~ /\+\s*(.*?)($Lval)\s*(==|\!=)\s*(true|false)\b(.*)$/i) {
> +			my $lead = $1;
> +			my $arg = $2;
> +			my $test = $3;
> +			my $otype = $4;
> +			my $trail = $5;
> +			my $type = lc($otype);
> +			my $op = "!";
> +			if (("$test" eq "==" && "$type" eq "true") ||
> +			    ("$test" eq "!=" && "$type" eq "false")) {
> +				$op = "";
> +			}
> +			WARN("BOOL_COMPARISON",
> +			     "Using comparison to $otype is poor style. Use '${lead}${op}${arg}${trail}'\n" . $herecurr);

In a complex case such as  a + b == false  will this do the right thing?
Not that I am sure that adding bools makes sense but assuming there is
some valid complex lval.

-apw
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ