[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130410210908.GG17641@mtj.dyndns.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 14:09:08 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...hat.com, x86@...nel.org,
rth@...ddle.net, linux@....linux.org.uk, msalter@...hat.com,
starvik@...s.com, dhowells@...hat.com, tony.luck@...el.com,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, takata@...ux-m32r.org,
geert@...ux-m68k.org, james.hogan@...tec.com, monstr@...str.eu,
ralf@...ux-mips.org, jonas@...thpole.se, rkuo@...eaurora.org,
schwidefsky@...ibm.com, liqin.chen@...plusct.com,
davem@...emloft.net, lethal@...ux-sh.org, vgupta@...opsys.com,
chris@...kel.net, cmetcalf@...era.com, ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp,
gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn, jdike@...toit.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH UPDATED 1/7] x86: don't show trace into stacktrace
machinery
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:22:20PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> This is double negation and is generally wrong in English. I think you
> want to say:
>
> "%pf specified neither frame nor regs for ..."
>
> or
>
> "%pf didn't specify either frame or regs for ..."
>
> Or maybe even passive and shorter:
>
> "%pf: No frame or regs specified for %%current."
>
> and so on.
Crap, right, will post an updated version soon.
Thanks!
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists