[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1365666364.27868.114.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 08:46:04 +0100
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH] xen-netback: switch to use
skb_partial_csum_set()
On Thu, 2013-04-11 at 07:35 +0100, Jason Wang wrote:
> Switch to use skb_partial_csum_set() to simplify the codes.
This is incremental on top of your previous patch, right?
>
> Cc: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
> ---
> Note:
> - Compile test only.
> ---
> drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c | 22 ++++++++--------------
> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
> index 83905a9..70631f0 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
> @@ -1156,7 +1156,6 @@ static int netbk_set_skb_gso(struct xenvif *vif,
> static int checksum_setup(struct xenvif *vif, struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> struct iphdr *iph;
> - unsigned char *th;
> int err = -EPROTO;
> int recalculate_partial_csum = 0;
>
> @@ -1180,28 +1179,26 @@ static int checksum_setup(struct xenvif *vif, struct sk_buff *skb)
> goto out;
>
> iph = (void *)skb->data;
> - th = skb->data + 4 * iph->ihl;
> - if (th >= skb_tail_pointer(skb))
> - goto out;
> -
> - skb_set_transport_header(skb, 4 * iph->ihl);
Is removing this line really correct?
> - skb->csum_start = th - skb->head;
> switch (iph->protocol) {
> case IPPROTO_TCP:
> - skb->csum_offset = offsetof(struct tcphdr, check);
> + if (!skb_partial_csum_set(skb, 4 * iph->ihl,
> + offsetof(struct tcphdr, check)))
> + goto out;
>
> if (recalculate_partial_csum) {
> - struct tcphdr *tcph = (struct tcphdr *)th;
> + struct tcphdr *tcph = tcp_hdr(skb);
> tcph->check = ~csum_tcpudp_magic(iph->saddr, iph->daddr,
> skb->len - iph->ihl*4,
> IPPROTO_TCP, 0);
> }
> break;
> case IPPROTO_UDP:
> - skb->csum_offset = offsetof(struct udphdr, check);
> + if (!skb_partial_csum_set(skb, 4 * iph->ihl,
> + offsetof(struct udphdr, check)))
> + goto out;
>
> if (recalculate_partial_csum) {
> - struct udphdr *udph = (struct udphdr *)th;
> + struct udphdr *udph = udp_hdr(skb);
> udph->check = ~csum_tcpudp_magic(iph->saddr, iph->daddr,
> skb->len - iph->ihl*4,
> IPPROTO_UDP, 0);
> @@ -1215,9 +1212,6 @@ static int checksum_setup(struct xenvif *vif, struct sk_buff *skb)
> goto out;
> }
>
> - if ((th + skb->csum_offset + 2) > skb_tail_pointer(skb))
> - goto out;
> -
> err = 0;
>
> out:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists