[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51666D28.7090500@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 15:58:32 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH] xen-netback: switch to use skb_partial_csum_set()
On 04/11/2013 03:46 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-04-11 at 07:35 +0100, Jason Wang wrote:
>> Switch to use skb_partial_csum_set() to simplify the codes.
> This is incremental on top of your previous patch, right?
It's an independent patch, since the previous patch has been applied.
>> Cc: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
>> ---
>> Note:
>> - Compile test only.
>> ---
>> drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c | 22 ++++++++--------------
>> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
>> index 83905a9..70631f0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
>> @@ -1156,7 +1156,6 @@ static int netbk_set_skb_gso(struct xenvif *vif,
>> static int checksum_setup(struct xenvif *vif, struct sk_buff *skb)
>> {
>> struct iphdr *iph;
>> - unsigned char *th;
>> int err = -EPROTO;
>> int recalculate_partial_csum = 0;
>>
>> @@ -1180,28 +1179,26 @@ static int checksum_setup(struct xenvif *vif, struct sk_buff *skb)
>> goto out;
>>
>> iph = (void *)skb->data;
>> - th = skb->data + 4 * iph->ihl;
>> - if (th >= skb_tail_pointer(skb))
>> - goto out;
>> -
>> - skb_set_transport_header(skb, 4 * iph->ihl);
> Is removing this line really correct?
After commit e5d5deca (net: core: let skb_partial_csum_set() set
transport header), this work was done by skb_partial_csum_set().
>
>> - skb->csum_start = th - skb->head;
>> switch (iph->protocol) {
>> case IPPROTO_TCP:
>> - skb->csum_offset = offsetof(struct tcphdr, check);
>> + if (!skb_partial_csum_set(skb, 4 * iph->ihl,
>> + offsetof(struct tcphdr, check)))
>> + goto out;
>>
>> if (recalculate_partial_csum) {
>> - struct tcphdr *tcph = (struct tcphdr *)th;
>> + struct tcphdr *tcph = tcp_hdr(skb);
>> tcph->check = ~csum_tcpudp_magic(iph->saddr, iph->daddr,
>> skb->len - iph->ihl*4,
>> IPPROTO_TCP, 0);
>> }
>> break;
>> case IPPROTO_UDP:
>> - skb->csum_offset = offsetof(struct udphdr, check);
>> + if (!skb_partial_csum_set(skb, 4 * iph->ihl,
>> + offsetof(struct udphdr, check)))
>> + goto out;
>>
>> if (recalculate_partial_csum) {
>> - struct udphdr *udph = (struct udphdr *)th;
>> + struct udphdr *udph = udp_hdr(skb);
>> udph->check = ~csum_tcpudp_magic(iph->saddr, iph->daddr,
>> skb->len - iph->ihl*4,
>> IPPROTO_UDP, 0);
>> @@ -1215,9 +1212,6 @@ static int checksum_setup(struct xenvif *vif, struct sk_buff *skb)
>> goto out;
>> }
>>
>> - if ((th + skb->csum_offset + 2) > skb_tail_pointer(skb))
>> - goto out;
>> -
>> err = 0;
>>
>> out:
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists