[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1365990909.29519.6.camel@Wailaba2>
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 21:55:09 -0400
From: Olivier Langlois <olivier@...llion01.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, fweisbec@...il.com,
schwidefsky@...ibm.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] process cputimer is moving faster than its
corresponding clock
On Fri, 2013-04-12 at 11:16 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-04-10 at 11:48 -0400, Olivier Langlois wrote:
> > Please explain how expensive it is. All I am seeing is a couple of
> > additions.
>
> Let me start with this, since your earlier argument also refers to
> this.
>
> So yes it does look simple and straight fwd, only one addition. However
> its an atomic operation across all threads of the same process. Imagine
> a single process with 512 threads, all running on a separate cpu.
>
Peter,
It now makes perfect sense. Thank you for your explanation. It is
showing me an aspect that I did overlook.
Greetings,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists