[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130416092429.GI3658@sgi.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 04:24:29 -0500
From: Robin Holt <holt@....com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Robin Holt <holt@....com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Russ Anderson <rja@....com>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"rusty@...tcorp.com.au" <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [Patch -v3 4/4] Make reboot_cpuid a kernel parameter.
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 11:01:09AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Robin Holt <holt@....com> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 10:47:49AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > > We usually don't break working user setups as a matter if policy. Only if it can't be avoided.
> > >
> > > Robin Holt <holt@....com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 10:18:31AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > > >> Um... doesn't this break anyone who currently depends on this?
> > > >
> > > >Yes. That is also why I kept this separate and not tagged for
> > > >stable. They would need to start using the more general kernel
> > > >parameter
> > > >to get the same functionality. Should I have done it differently?
> >
> > How about:
> > Author: Robin Holt <holt@....com>
> > Date: Mon Apr 15 11:39:33 2013 -0500
> >
> > Make reboot_cpuid a kernel parameter.
> >
> > Moving the reboot=s<##> parameter for x86 to a kernel parameter
> > proper. I did not find any other arch that was specifying the
> > reboot cpu.
> >
> > I left a compatibility mode in there. The new parameter always
> > takes precedence. I also fixed up the current code to support
> > up to cpuid's up to the current max of 4096.
>
> Looks pretty nice and clean to me, as the old boot parameter still keeps working.
>
> Mind sending an updated series that includes all the fixes and the Tested-by from
> Shawn Guo?
Will do. I am still going through the comments from Joe Perches to the
third patch. Already have added the Tested-by to just the first patch.
Otherwise, I am ready to send -v4.
Robin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists