[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201304172205.35526.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 22:05:35 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Padma Venkat <padma.kvr@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 29/30] spi: s3c64xx: move to generic dmaengine API
On Thursday 11 April 2013, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> @@ -713,9 +836,9 @@ static int s3c64xx_spi_transfer_one_message(struct spi_master *master,
> }
>
> /* Polling method for xfers not bigger than FIFO capacity */
> - if (xfer->len <= ((FIFO_LVL_MASK(sdd) >> 1) + 1))
> - use_dma = 0;
> - else
> + use_dma = 0;
> + if (sdd->rx_dma.ch && sdd->tx_dma.ch &&
> + (xfer->len > ((FIFO_LVL_MASK(sdd) >> 1) + 1)))
> use_dma = 1;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&sdd->lock, flags);
Can you try just reverting this hunk? It's actually not required and
comes from an earlier version of the patch. I assumed it was harmless,
but it's the only think I see that should actually make a difference
in my patch for the case of !CONFIG_SAMSUNG_DMADEV.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists