[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <516FE214.6010008@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 17:37:48 +0530
From: Sourav Poddar <sourav.poddar@...com>
To: <balbi@...com>
CC: <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <tony@...mide.com>,
<rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>, <khilman@...aro.org>,
<linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] driver: serial: omap: add prepare/complete callback
for "no_console_suspend" case
Hi Felipe,
On Thursday 18 April 2013 09:28 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 05:04:24PM +0530, Sourav Poddar wrote:
>> @@ -1632,6 +1650,8 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops serial_omap_dev_pm_ops = {
>> SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(serial_omap_suspend, serial_omap_resume)
>> SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(serial_omap_runtime_suspend,
>> serial_omap_runtime_resume, NULL)
>> + .prepare = serial_omap_prepare,
>> + .complete = serial_omap_complete,
> if CONFIG_PM_SLEEP isn't defined, this will break compilation.
>
True.
Then, will it not be a better idea to add a similar macro[1] in
include/linux/pm.h for
prepare/complete callback as it is present for suspend/resume ?.
[1]:
#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
#define SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(suspend_fn, resume_fn) \
.suspend = suspend_fn, \
.resume = resume_fn, \
.freeze = suspend_fn, \
.thaw = resume_fn, \
.poweroff = suspend_fn, \
.restore = resume_fn,
#else
#define SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(suspend_fn, resume_fn)
#endif
~Sourav
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists