[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1366327735.3824.50.camel@misato.fc.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 17:28:55 -0600
From: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
To: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linuxram@...ibm.com,
rientjes@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [Bug fix PATCH v4] Reusing a resource structure allocated by
bootmem
On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 08:33 +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
:
> >
> >> +static struct resource *get_resource(gfp_t flags)
> >> +{
> >> + struct resource *res = NULL;
> >> +
> >> + spin_lock(&bootmem_resource_lock);
> >> + if (bootmem_resource.sibling) {
> >> + res = bootmem_resource.sibling;
> >> + bootmem_resource.sibling = res->sibling;
> >> + memset(res, 0, sizeof(struct resource));
> >> + }
> >> + spin_unlock(&bootmem_resource_lock);
> >
>
> > I prefer to keep memset() outside of the spin lock.
> >
> > spin_lock(&bootmem_resource_lock);
> > if (..) {
> > :
> > spin_unlock(&bootmem_resource_lock);
> > memset(res, 0, sizeof(struct resource));
> > } else {
> > spin_unlock(&bootmem_resource_lock);
> > res = kzalloc(sizeof(struct resource), flags);
> > }
>
> Hmm. It is a little ugly. How about it?
>
> spin_lock(&bootmem_resource_lock);
> if (bootmem_resource.sibling) {
> res = bootmem_resource.sibling;
> bootmem_resource.sibling = res->sibling;
> }
> spin_unlock(&bootmem_resource_lock);
>
> if (res)
> memset(res, 0, sizeof(struct resource));
> else
> res = kzalloc(sizeof(struct resource), flags);
Sounds good to me.
Thanks,
-Toshi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists