[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5170853B.2040807@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 08:43:55 +0900
From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
To: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
CC: <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <linuxram@...ibm.com>,
<rientjes@...gle.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug fix PATCH v4] Reusing a resource structure allocated by
bootmem
2013/04/19 8:28, Toshi Kani wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 08:33 +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
> :
>>>
>>>> +static struct resource *get_resource(gfp_t flags)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct resource *res = NULL;
>>>> +
>>>> + spin_lock(&bootmem_resource_lock);
>>>> + if (bootmem_resource.sibling) {
>>>> + res = bootmem_resource.sibling;
>>>> + bootmem_resource.sibling = res->sibling;
>>>> + memset(res, 0, sizeof(struct resource));
>>>> + }
>>>> + spin_unlock(&bootmem_resource_lock);
>>>
>>
>>> I prefer to keep memset() outside of the spin lock.
>>>
>>> spin_lock(&bootmem_resource_lock);
>>> if (..) {
>>> :
>>> spin_unlock(&bootmem_resource_lock);
>>> memset(res, 0, sizeof(struct resource));
>>> } else {
>>> spin_unlock(&bootmem_resource_lock);
>>> res = kzalloc(sizeof(struct resource), flags);
>>> }
>>
>> Hmm. It is a little ugly. How about it?
>>
>> spin_lock(&bootmem_resource_lock);
>> if (bootmem_resource.sibling) {
>> res = bootmem_resource.sibling;
>> bootmem_resource.sibling = res->sibling;
>> }
>> spin_unlock(&bootmem_resource_lock);
>>
>> if (res)
>> memset(res, 0, sizeof(struct resource));
>> else
>> res = kzalloc(sizeof(struct resource), flags);
>
> Sounds good to me.
Great. I'll update it.
Thanks,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu
>
> Thanks,
> -Toshi
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists