[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51725ED4.8020001@nexus-software.ie>
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 10:24:36 +0100
From: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue.lkml@...us-software.ie>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
CC: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, fenghua.yu@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Add check for P5 to microcode_intel_early
On 20/04/13 00:13, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 04/19/2013 02:44 PM, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>> On 19/04/13 22:25, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:55:15PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>>>> Just filter out P5 and earlier. The code already does that for CPUs
>>>> which don't have CPUID.
>>>
>>> Actually, an alternative - more practical albeit not very accurate
>>
>> More practical ? Hmm - the MSRs don't exist for< P5
>>
>>> solution would be to check for which families Intel delivers microcode
>>> and do the cut off there with a comment as to why you do it like
>>> that.void
>>
>> You mean return !intel so this function will never be called.
>>
>> __init load_ucode_bsp(void)
>> {
>> int vendor = x86_vendor();
>>
>> if (vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL)
>> load_ucode_intel_bsp();
>> }
>>
>> Ah yes. That would work and be less code.
>>
>> We should do it that way.
>
> Do you think you can have a patch for me in the next few hours?
Sure.
I'm in Ireland (sleeping @ 00:15 on a Friday night sadly).
Give me ~ 40 minutes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists