linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: kaslr: move ELF relocation handling to C

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGXu5jKFSmBTQ5Ay+MypkAStvDMrkWMNHCz4XGyy4bVjyVAnHg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 21 Apr 2013 12:46:24 -0700
From:	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
	"kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" 
	<kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@...el.com>,
	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, Olaf Hering <olaf@...fle.de>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
	Gokul Caushik <caushik1@...il.com>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
	Joe Millenbach <jmillenbach@...il.com>,
	Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>,
	Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@....com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
	Eric Northup <digitaleric@...gle.com>,
	Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@...curity.com>,
	Julien Tinnes <jln@...gle.com>, Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: kaslr: move ELF relocation handling to C

On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 2:13 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> * Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>
>> Moves the relocation handling into C, after decompression. Only
>> kernels that need relocation support will use the code. The new
>> CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE does not yet do anything except turn on this logic
>> for 64-bit kernels.
>
> So why not keep the inactive CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE hunks in a separate
> patch, and just have this one clean, orthogonal patch that moves
> relocation handling into C?

I had wanted there to be a way to test building with 64-bit
relocations. With this patch and CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE=y, I could do
that. Would you rather I remove those pieces?

-Kees

--
Kees Cook
Chrome OS Security
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/