[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130421195534.GA13543@thunk.org>
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2013 15:55:34 -0400
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Cc: Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@...ck.org,
Linux Kernel Developers List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
mgorman@...e.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ext4: mark metadata blocks using bh flags
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 08:09:14AM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 04/21/2013 02:07 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > This allows metadata writebacks which are issued via block device
> > writeback to be sent with the current write request flags.
>
> Hi, where do these come from?
> fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c: In function ‘__ext4_handle_dirty_metadata’:
> fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c:218:2: error: implicit declaration of function
> ‘mark_buffer_meta’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c:219:2: error: implicit declaration of function
> ‘mark_buffer_prio’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
They are defined by "[PATCH 2/3] buffer: add BH_Prio and BH_Meta flags" here:
+BUFFER_FNS(Meta, meta)
+BUFFER_FNS(Prio, prio)
When you tried applying this patch, did you try applying all three
patches in the patch series?
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists