[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201304221438.15945.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 14:38:15 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: "Lars-Peter Clausen" <lars@...afoo.de>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>, Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@...com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dma: of: Remove restriction that #dma-cells can't be 0
On Monday 22 April 2013, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>
> There is no sensible reason why #dma-cells shouldn't be allowed to be 0. It is
> completely up to the DMA controller how many additional parameters, besides the
> phandle, it needs to identify a channel. E.g. for DMA controller with only one
> channel or for DMA controllers which don't have a restriction on which channel
> can be used for which peripheral it completely legitimate to not require any
> additional parameters.
>
> Also fixes the following warning:
> drivers/dma/of-dma.c: In function 'of_dma_controller_register':
> drivers/dma/of-dma.c:67:7: warning: 'nbcells' may be used uninitialized in this function
>
> Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
Do you have an example for this? If a dma engine has only one request line,
why would you even use the dmaengine subsystem for it, rather than including
the code to program it in the slave driver?
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists