| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20130422142318.GL14496@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:23:18 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk> To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>, "xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "will.deacon@....com" <will.deacon@....com>, "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>, "rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>, "marc.zyngier@....com" <marc.zyngier@....com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] arm: introduce psci_smp_ops On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 05:49:21PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Thu, 18 Apr 2013, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > Please let's keep the order as we discussed. Otherwise this is just too > > confusing (Russell's comment is a good example of that). > > You are right, it is confusing. > By "keep the order as we discussed", do you mean merge the second patch > into the first one, correct? Well, the solution to this kind of confusion is to ignore comments on the older patches and post a new set of patches and ask for all relevant comments to be against that set and that set only. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists