[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51756CB6.5060607@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 10:00:38 -0700
From: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
CC: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>, arm@...nel.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] ARM 64 bit sched_clock take #2
On 04/19/2013 05:29 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> This is what I was thinking. I don't see why we can't move this to generic code and have arm64 use it too. Those patches will follow once I find an arm64
> compiler.
I think moving this to generic code sounds like a good idea. You could
probably also prototype and test the 64bit code with x86_64, using the
TSC counter.
thanks
-john
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists