[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51756D04.6030001@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 10:01:56 -0700
From: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Resume does not work after timekeeping change
On 04/21/2013 07:48 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Apr 2013, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> my machine does not wake from suspend to RAM on my box running the -next
>> kernel. The last thing I see is "Disabling non-boot CPUs ...". I
>> bisected it to this commit:
>>
>> commit 7ec98e15aa049b7a2ca73485f31cf4f90c34e2dd
>> Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>> Date: Thu Feb 21 22:51:39 2013 +0000
>>
>> timekeeping: Delay update of clock->cycle_last
>>
>>
>> Reverting that one on the top of -next-20130419 makes it work again.
> Does the patch below fix the issue?
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
> ---
> diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
> index 675f720..98cd470 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
> @@ -951,7 +951,7 @@ static void timekeeping_resume(void)
> __timekeeping_inject_sleeptime(tk, &ts_delta);
>
> /* Re-base the last cycle value */
> - clock->cycle_last = cycle_now;
> + tk->cycle_last = clock->cycle_last = cycle_now;
Looks good.
Acked-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists