linux-kernel - Re: Re: Re: [PATCH] I2C: Change the value of octeon i2c adapter timeout value

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130423162751.GA3228@the-dreams.de>
Date:	Tue, 23 Apr 2013 18:27:51 +0200
From:	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To:	EUNBONG SONG <eunb.song@...sung.com>
Cc:	"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH]  I2C: Change the value of octeon i2c adapter
 timeout value

Hi,

what mail client do you use? It seems to break message threading on my side :(


> > Have you been writing to EEPROMS? Their erase/write cycle might be
> > longer. But I am not forcing you to change the value, just giving some
> > suggestions.
> 
> My board has i2c mux, temp sensor, eeprom.  And I added some debugging code for measuring i2c response time as below  and 
> run i2c operation for each device. 
> The maximum respeonse time was 500usec(under 1msec). So 20 msec is enough for adapter timeout. 

Well, OK, I don't mind. We can increase it later if needed.

Applied to for-next, thanks! Please have a look later how I changed your
commit messages to see the preferred style.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/