[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130423122905.33ac0d3c@annuminas.surriel.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 12:29:05 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@...com>
Subject: [PATCH -mm] ipc,sem: fix locking in semctl_main
Andrew, here is the patch I promised :)
Everywhere else in the code, we check sma->sem_perm.deleted under
the semaphore array lock, so we should do teh same here.
The easy fix is to simply not drop and re-take the lock, but keep
it locked.
This patch can be folded into ipcsem-fine-grained-locking-for-semtimedop.patch
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
---
ipc/sem.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ipc/sem.c b/ipc/sem.c
index 5711616..efdaee6 100644
--- a/ipc/sem.c
+++ b/ipc/sem.c
@@ -1243,10 +1243,9 @@ static int semctl_main(struct ipc_namespace *ns, int semid, int semnum,
err = -EIDRM;
goto out_free;
}
- sem_unlock(sma, -1);
- }
+ } else
+ sem_lock(sma, NULL, -1);
- sem_lock(sma, NULL, -1);
for (i = 0; i < sma->sem_nsems; i++)
sem_io[i] = sma->sem_base[i].semval;
sem_unlock(sma, -1);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists