lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130423.133732.2222922370397287096.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 23 Apr 2013 13:37:32 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:	David.Laight@...lab.com, mingo@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de, tytso@....edu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	x86@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Unsigned widening casts of binary "not" operations..

From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 08:42:49 -0700

> An explicit cast fixes it, and shows that you were aware of the issue:
> 
>    foo &= ~(foo_t)bar;
> 
> and gcc will generate the right logic. Of course, casts then have
> their own problems, which your thing avoids (as would just having a
> "andn" operation in C)

I just want to mention that this is dangerous in different ways, we
just recently got a patch in the networking that removed such a cast.
The problem is when the cast narrows, f.e.:

	~(u8)0

doesn't do what you think it does.  That doesn't evaluate to 0xff.

You all are very bright and probably know this already.

So,if it widens, which is the situation we're talking about, you're
good.  But until I saw the above u8 thing I never suspected that
narrowing in this kind of expression was dangerous.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ