[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5179652F.8080507@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:17:35 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
CC: Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@....com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/4] perf: Add hardware breakpoint address mask
On 04/25/2013 10:06 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>>
>> The downside is that in userland perf tool we need differing documentation
>> on what the mask syntax means for each architecture.
>
> Personally I think this is acceptable.
>
> But I am new to this code, so...
>
That would seem really, really awkward. Yes, perf has a bunch of
low-level stuff, but it would seem highly undesirable to force the user
to deal with something like that.
It would be good to have a user-friendly syntax that covers most of what
users may want to do and perhaps a longer form that can express
everything including ARM's byte selects; if the system can't honor the
request it should return an error.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists