[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130425171842.GA8669@dyad.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 19:18:42 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, eranian@...gle.com,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Fix perf LBR filtering
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 07:00:37PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Traping the read deals with the first. The second shouldn't be a problem since
> > we generally only allow kernel info for CAP_ADMIN; if we don't already for LBR
> > that needs to be fixed separately.
>
> Where is that check? I don't see it.
Then that might need fixing.
> Also remember that precise == 2 can enable LBR implicitly.
Sure.. but it doesn't need the filter stuff. Now I completely forgot if it will
actually still use the filter muck.. /me goes check
I think intel_pmu_lbr_filter() will typically bail on the X86_BR_ALL test for
PEBS fixup, it might only end up in the filter code if precise_br_compat()
finds another LBR user compatible with the fixup.
> > That only leaves the third.. can we descern MMIO maps from the kernel page tables?
>
> In theory you could use some bits in the PTE for vmalloc, but it would need quite a
> few changes.
>
> Also there may be corner cases where MMIO is in the direct mapping or in
> the kernel mapping.
Hrmm... do we keep track of the MMIO regions somewhere at all?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists