[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AE90C24D6B3A694183C094C60CF0A2F6026B7203@saturn3.aculab.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 09:21:59 +0100
From: "David Laight" <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Chas Williams" <chas@....nrl.navy.mil>,
<linux-atm-general@...ts.sourceforge.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 05/21] atm: he: use mdelay instead of large udelay constants
> ARM cannot handle udelay for more than 2 miliseconds, so we
> should use mdelay instead for those.
...
> @@ -1055,7 +1055,7 @@ static int he_start(struct atm_dev *dev)
> he_writel(he_dev, 0x0, RESET_CNTL);
> he_writel(he_dev, 0xff, RESET_CNTL);
>
> - udelay(16*1000); /* 16 ms */
> + mdelay(16); /* 16 ms */
> status = he_readl(he_dev, RESET_CNTL);
16ms seems a long time to spin.
I'd have thought a sleep would be more appropriate.
Since this looks like timing a hardware reset pulse
it can't matter if it is somewhat longer.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists