[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130426082407.GB20927@linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 10:24:07 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
RT <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Clark Williams <clark@...hat.com>,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT v2] x86/mce: Defer mce wakeups to threads for
PREEMPT_RT
* Steven Rostedt | 2013-04-11 14:33:34 [-0400]:
>diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
>index e8d8ad0..060e473 100644
>--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
>+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
>@@ -1308,6 +1309,61 @@ static void mce_do_trigger(struct work_struct *work)
>
> static DECLARE_WORK(mce_trigger_work, mce_do_trigger);
>
>+static void __mce_notify_work(void)
>+{
>+ /* Not more than two messages every minute */
>+ static DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(ratelimit, 60*HZ, 2);
>+
>+ /* wake processes polling /dev/mcelog */
>+ wake_up_interruptible(&mce_chrdev_wait);
>+
>+ /*
>+ * There is no risk of missing notifications because
>+ * work_pending is always cleared before the function is
>+ * executed.
>+ */
>+ if (mce_helper[0] && !work_pending(&mce_trigger_work))
>+ schedule_work(&mce_trigger_work);
Why is here this work_pending() check? You can't enqueue a work item
twice.
Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists