linux-kernel - Re: linux-next build error (at91)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 30 Apr 2013 11:15:25 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
To:	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
cc:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Jon Medhurst <tixy@...aro.org>,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
	Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next build error (at91) - use of bool in mach/arch.h

On Tue, 30 Apr 2013, Stefano Stabellini wrote:

> On Tue, 30 Apr 2013, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com> wrote:
> > > So, I am wondering if the best correction is to add the types.h header file
> > > in the asm/mach/arch.h file, like this:
> > >
> > > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/mach/arch.h
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/mach/arch.h
> > > @@ -8,6 +8,8 @@
> > >   * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> > >   */
> > >
> > > +#include <linux/types.h>
> > > +
> > >  #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> > >
> > >  struct tag;
> > >
> > > or if a better option would be to re-arrange the include directives in
> > > various at91xxx_devices.c files?
> > 
> > Include files should be self-contained, so asm/mach/arch.h is the right place.
> 
> Nicolas,
> are you happy to come up with a proper patch to fix the issue?

I'd prefer if you just folded the above include into the original patch, 
unless this has been pulled already.


Nicolas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/