[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <517FE013.1000509@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 16:15:31 +0100
From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@...aro.org>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
CC: "xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"konrad.wilk@...cle.com" <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
"patches@...aro.org" <patches@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen: clear IRQ_NOAUTOEN and IRQ_NOREQUEST when a VIRQ
is bound
On 04/30/2013 04:02 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Apr 2013, Julien Grall wrote:
>> Reset the IRQ_NOAUTOEN and IRQ_NOREQUEST flags that are enabled by
>> default on ARM. If IRQ_NOAUTOEN is set, __setup_irq doesn't call
>> irq_startup, that is responsible for calling irq_unmask at startup time.
>> As a result event channels remain masked.
>>
>> The clear is already made in bind_evtchn_to_irq with commit a8636c0 but was
>> missing in bind_virq_to_irq.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@...aro.org>
>
> As in the original commit, you should point out that this change does
> not have any effects on x86 (where IRQ_NOREQUEST and IRQ_NOAUTOEN are
> cleared by default).
>
> At this point we might as well do this consistently everywhere we
> allocate a new evtchn irq, including pirqs and ipis, even though we don't
> actually use them on ARM.
>
> If the call to irq_clear_status_flags can be moved earlier, a good place
> for it could be xen_irq_init.
Thanks for the review. I will give a try and send a version with it if
the solution works.
--
Julien
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists