[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130430024552.GA26726@verge.net.au>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 11:45:52 +0900
From: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ipvs: Use cond_resched_rcu_lock() helper when
dumping connections
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 08:15:34AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au> wrote:
>
> > This avoids the situation where a dump of a large number of connections
> > may prevent scheduling for a long time while also avoiding excessive
> > calls to rcu_read_unlock() and rcu_read_lock().
> >
> > Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> > Cc: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
> > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
> > ---
> > net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c | 6 ++----
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c
> > index a083bda..42a7b33 100644
> > --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c
> > +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c
> > @@ -975,8 +975,7 @@ static void *ip_vs_conn_array(struct seq_file *seq, loff_t pos)
> > return cp;
> > }
> > }
> > - rcu_read_unlock();
> > - rcu_read_lock();
> > + cond_resched_rcu_lock();
> > }
> >
> > return NULL;
> > @@ -1015,8 +1014,7 @@ static void *ip_vs_conn_seq_next(struct seq_file *seq, void *v, loff_t *pos)
> > iter->l = &ip_vs_conn_tab[idx];
> > return cp;
> > }
> > - rcu_read_unlock();
> > - rcu_read_lock();
> > + cond_resched_rcu_lock();
>
> Feel free to route this via the networking tree.
>
> Note that this change isn't a pure clean-up but has functional effects as
> well: on !PREEMPT or PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY kernels it will add in a potential
> cond_resched() - while previously it would only rcu unlock and relock
> (which in itself isn't scheduling).
>
> This should probably be pointed out in the changelog.
Thanks, I have added some text which I will include in v2.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists