[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130502065358.GA41008@bingao-desk1.fm.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 23:53:58 -0700
From: Bin Gao <bin.gao@...ux.intel.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: x86/pci/mrst: force all pci config toward 0:0:0, 0:2:0 and 0:3:0
to type 1
On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 11:17:10AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> Is there any possibility of multi-function devices at bus 0, device 0, 2, or 3?
>
> What about bridges -- can any of these be a bridge?
>
> If either of those could happen, these checks could be too specific.
0:2:0 and 0:3:0 are the only 2 devices behind the bridge 0:0:0.
These devices don't implement pcie capability list in legacy config space
so no offset above 255 would be triggered.
The fixed bar pcie capability located at 0x100 is for pci-shimed device
only, not for 0, 2 and 3. But current implementation applies it to 0,
2 and 3 as well. This is what the patch is going to address.
>
> Is there a doc that identifies these cases where config mechanism #1
> should be used instead of MMCONFIG?
Unfortunately no doc identifies this.
But since FW doesn't provide pci shim for device 0, 2 and 3,
and these 3 real pci devices have only 256 bytes legacy pci
config space so they can only be accessed by type 1.
>
> Bjorn
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists